Temporal Trends in Pediatric Mental Health Visits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Understanding the temporality of mental health presentations to the emergency department (ED) during the 24-hour cycle, day of the week, and month of the year may facilitate strategic planning of ED-based mental health services. METHODS: Data on 30,656 ED presentations for mental illness, substance use, or intentional self-harm by 20,956 patients (≤ 17 years) were examined. We studied patient demography, discharge diagnosis, and time and date of presentation. RESULTS: Most pediatric mental health ED visits (66.0%) occurred after the average work and school day (after 5 PM). Presentations related to substance use and intentional self-harm steadily increased in the evening. Emergency department visits related to substance use peaked on Friday through Sunday (4723/7475; 63.2%), whereas visits for mood disorders (4127/5093; 81.0%), neurotic/stress-related disorders (5960/7989; 74.6%), and behavioral/emotional disorders (237/304; 78%) were highest during the work/school week (Monday to Friday). Visits for intentional self-harm peaked following the weekend (Monday: 771/4676; 16.5%). Summer months had fewer visits (6862/30,656; 22.4%), whereas March to May (range: 2752-2912 visits) and October to November (range: 2701-2751 visits) showed more steady peaks in volume. Most presentations by diagnostic group decreased in volume during the winter months (December to February) to increase again in the spring (March to May). CONCLUSIONS: Peak times for pediatric mental health presentations to the ED are evenings throughout the week, suggesting that mental health services for children, adolescents, and their families should be available after work and school hours, 7 days a week.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".