MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057991078 · doi:10.13031/2013.36276

Determination of Microbial Communities beneath Livestock Burial Sites

2010· article· en· W2057991078 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Dyan Pratt, Tim Dumonceaux

Bibliographic record

VenueASABE/CSBE North Central Intersectional Meeting · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsPyrosequencingMicrobial population biologyMicroorganismTopsoilEnvironmental scienceBiologySoil waterEnvironmental chemistryGeologyEcologyPaleontologyBacteriaChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A ten year old livestock burial site near Pierceland, Saskatchewan was continuously cored and analyzed for microbial communities at varying depths below the soil surface by molecular methods. 16S rRNA gene targets and quantitative PCR was utilized to provide a quantitative analysis of genomes per gram of soil and cpn-60 targets were used to amplify DNA for taxonomic profiling by 454 pyrosequencing. Quantification results demonstrate a three orders of magnitude greater difference in genomes at depths within and up to two meters below the burial trench as compared to a background core. Topsoil and depths below 6 meters show similar quantities of microbes for both the core through the burial trench and the background core. A total of 5905 OTUs was found at a variety of abundances in all of the 13 core samples that were analyzed. Taxonomic analysis indicated that the overall community composition changed considerably with increasing depth, and that the burial core community was distinct from the control core at the same depth. In the burial core, organisms that are associated with phosphate accumulation, nitrogen fixation, and ammonium oxidation were found in highest abundance near the surface (up to 2.5 m), while organisms associated with sulfate reduction were concentrated just below the burial depth (4.5-4.8 m). The microbial community at the burial site (3.75 m) was dominated by anaerobic microorganisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASABE/CSBE North Central Intersectional MeetingSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207