MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2057999664 · doi:10.1126/stke.2712005re2

Protein Interfaces in Signaling Regulated by Arginine Methylation

2005· review· en· W2057999664 on OpenAlexaff
François‐Michel Boisvert, Carol Anne Chénard

Bibliographic record

VenueScience s STKE · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethylationArginineProtein arginine methyltransferase 5Signal transductionProtein methylationBiologyBiochemistryCell biologyMethyltransferaseAmino acidGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Posttranslational modifications are well-known effectors of signal transduction. Arginine methylation is a covalent modification that results in the addition of methyl groups to the nitrogen atoms of the arginine side chains. A probable role of arginine methylation in signal transduction is emerging with the identification of new arginine-methylated proteins. However, the functional consequences of arginine methylation and its mode of regulation remain unknown. The identification of the protein arginine methyltransferase family and the development of methylarginine-specific antibodies have raised renewed interest in this modification during the last decade. Arginine methylation was mainly observed on abundant proteins such as RNA-binding proteins and histones, but recent advances have revealed a plethora of arginine-methylated proteins implicated in a variety of cellular processes, including signaling by interferon and cytokines, and in T cell signaling. We discuss these recent advances and the role of arginine methylation in signal transduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations122
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience s STKESame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207