MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058010283 · doi:10.4271/2013-01-1091

Multi-Dimensional Modeling and Validation of Combustion in a High-Efficiency Dual-Fuel Light-Duty Engine

2013· article· en· W2058010283 on OpenAlexaff
Zihan Wang, Riccardo Scarcelli, Sibendu Som, Steven S. McConnell, Nameer Salman, York Zhu, Ken Hardman, Kevin Freeman, Ronald Reese, P. K. Senecal, Mandhapati Raju, Shawn Givler

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsChrysler (Canada)
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryVehicle Technologies OfficeOffice of Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyOffice of ScienceUniversity of Chicago
KeywordsDual (grammatical number)CombustionAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using gasoline and diesel simultaneously in a dual-fuel combustion system has shown effective benefits in terms of both brake thermal efficiency and exhaust emissions. In this study, the dual-fuel approach is applied to a light-duty spark ignition (SI) gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine. Three combustion modes are proposed based on the engine load, diesel micro-pilot (DMP) combustion at high load, SI combustion at low load, and diesel assisted spark-ignition (DASI) combustion in the transition zone. Major focus is put on the DMP mode, where the diesel fuel acts as an enhancer for ignition and combustion of the mixture of gasoline, air, and recirculated exhaust gas. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is used to simulate the dual-fuel combustion with the final goal of supporting the comprehensive optimization of the main engine parameters. In the proposed automated procedure, the 1-D code GT-Power is used to provide the initial and boundary conditions for detailed 3-D simulations, carried out by the multi-dimensional CFD code CONVERGE. A dual-fuel chemical kinetic mechanism consisting of 43 species and 78 reactions is initially used in 0-D combustion simulations and the results are validated against experimental data of ignition delay. The dual-fuel mechanism is then implemented in the 3-D combustion model and results from numerical simulations of the entire engine cycle were validated against experimental data (pressure and rate of heat release traces) on a large variety of operating conditions consisting of 6 DMP modes and 1 SI mode. Results show accurate prediction of combustion in all the examined cases. Two-stage heat release was observed in the DMP mode due to a gradient in fuel reactivity. Combustion is sensitive to several parameters, such as injection pressure and timing for gasoline and diesel, intake temperature, EGR rate, etc. The effect of such parameters on the dual-fuel combustion process is therefore evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207