MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058021127 · doi:10.1080/15389580802344788

A Tale of Two Cities: The Effect of Extended Drinking Hours in Licensed Establishments on Impaired Driving and Assault Charges

2008· article· en· W2058021127 on OpenAlexaffabout
Evelyn Vingilis, A. Ian McLeod, Robert E. Mann, Jane Seeley

Bibliographic record

VenueTraffic Injury Prevention · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthWestern University
FundersNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
KeywordsWindsorThursdayPoison controlInjury preventionDemographySuicide preventionMedicineForensic engineeringEnvironmental healthEngineeringSociologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: On May 1, 1996, Ontario, Canada, amended the Liquor Licence Act to extend the hours of alcohol sales and service in licensed establishments from 1 to 2 a.m. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of extended drinking hours on two cities in southwestern Ontario, Canada, one of which (London) would be affected by the alcohol control policy of extended drinking hours and the second city (Windsor) would be affected by two alcohol policies, extended drinking hours, and cross-border legal drinking age differences between Ontario and Michigan. Specifically, this study tested whether there were differences in impaired driving and assault charges in London and Windsor, Ontario, concomitant with the extended drinking hour amendment. METHODS: A quasi-experimental design using interrupted time series was used to assess changes. The analyzed data sets were monthly police impaired driving and assault charges data for Ontario, for the 11-12 p.m., 12-1 a.m., 1-2 a.m., 2-3 a.m. and 3-4 a.m. time windows, for 4 years pre- and 3 years post-policy change. RESULTS: Overall, London and Windsor exhibited significant overall reductions in impaired driving charges and no changes for assault charges aggregated over the 11 p.m.-4 a.m. time period after the drinking hours were extended. Within the different time windows, London showed significant decreases for the 1-2 a.m. Sunday-Wednesday and Thursday-Sunday time periods and a significant increase for the Sunday-Wednesday 3-4 a.m. time period, while Windsor demonstrated significant decreases in impaired driving charges for 1-2 a.m. Sunday-Wednesday and Thursday-Saturday time periods and significant increases for Sunday-Wednesday 2-3 and 3-4 a.m. and for Thursday-Saturday 2-3 a.m. For assault charges, no overall pre-post differences were found for the aggregated 11 p.m.-4 a.m. time period for either city. When the data were disaggregated by hour, a significant decrease was found in London for Thursday-Saturday 1-2 a.m. and significant increases for Sunday-Wednesday 2-3 a.m. and Thursday-Saturday 3-4 a.m. time periods, while no significant decreases were found in Windsor during the 1-2 a.m. time periods and one significant increase occurred during the Thursday-Saturday 2-3 a.m. time period. CONCLUSIONS: These findings, based on police data, suggest no overall effect on charges aggregated over the 11 p.m. to 4 a.m. time window, although some differences were observed for the different hours after 2 a.m., with a possible effect of the one hour extension of drinking in licensed establishments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraffic Injury PreventionSame topicSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207