PCR cloning of polyhydroxyalkanoate biosynthesis genes from<i>Burkholderia caryophylli</i>and their functional expression in recombinant<i>Escherichia coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The PCR cloning strategy for type II polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) biosynthesis genes established previously for Pseudomonas was successfully applied to Burkholderia caryophylli strain AS 1.2741. The whole pha locus containing PHA synthase genes phaC1, phaC2 and PHA depolymerase gene phaZ was cloned. The complete open reading frames of phaC1(Bc), phaC2(Bc) and phaZ(Bc) were identified. Sequence analyses of the phaC1(Bc), phaZ(Bc) and phaC2(Bc) showed more than 77.7%, 73.7% and 68.5% identities compared with the corresponding pha loci of the known Pseudomonas strains, respectively. The functional expression of the phaC1(Bc) or phaC2(Bc) in Escherichia coli strain KM32B (fadB deleted mutant) showed the abilities of PHA production by the estimated PHA synthase genes. Over 1% PHA consisting of 3-hydroxyhexanoate (3HHx), 3-hydroxyoctanoate (3HO) and 3-hydroxydecanoate (3HD) was detected from cells of recombinant E. coli KM32B (pHXM11) harboring phaC1(Bc), grown on octanoate. At the same time over 3% of PHA consisting of 3HO and 3HD was produced from cells of recombinant E. coli KM32B (pHXM21) harboring phaC2(BC), grown on decanoate. Results showed the PCR cloning strategy developed previously can be applied to non-Pseudomonas strains such as Burkholderia in this case. This result also provided evidence for the presumption that the Burkholderia strain possesses not only polyhydroxybutyrate synthase genes, but also synthase for medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoates consisting of 3HHx, 3HO and 3HD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".