Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rebellion and NkandlaThe Zulu Rebellion of 1906 was the violent response to the imposition ofa poll tax of £1 on all adult males (with exempted categories) by the government ofthe British South African colony of Natal on the part of a section of the indigenous,Zulu-speaking people. The rebellion was in the nature of “secondary resistance” toEuropean colonization, and the poll tax was only the immediate cause of it. Not allthe African people (who made up 82% of the colony’s population) participated inthe rebellion; only a few did, but there was the potential for a mass uprising, whichinspired great fear among the European settlers (who made up just 8,3% of thepopulation) and prompted the colony’s responsible government to take quick andvigorous action to crush the rebellion before it could spread. The object of the rebels, beyond the removal of the poll tax, was to drive the white settlers out of thecountry and to restore the pre-colonial regime, although it was unclear just what theythought that might have been. In the case of most (but not all) of the those living inthe Province of Zululand, i.e. the northeastern quarter of the Colony of Natal, itmeant the restoration of the Zulu monarchy under the chief Dinuzulu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".