Characterization of individual multifunctional nanoobjects with restricted geometry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anisotropic nanostructures such as nanowires (NWs)/nanotubes and nanometer-sized islands are the subject of intense research efforts due to several interesting phenomena observed to occur in confined geometries with a high aspect ratio and/or reduced size. Understanding and controlling the mechanical and electromechanical behaviors of these nanostructures are crucial for the practical implementation of such building blocks as active or passive components in nanodevices. Recent progresses toward the characterization of individual one-dimensional (NWs and nanotubes) and two-dimensional (islands) functional nanoscale objects of piezoelectric and ferroelectric (BaTiO3, Bi4Ti3O12 (BiT), and NaNbO3) and multiferroics (BiFeO3 and Bi2FeCrO6 (BFCO)) are presented. These nanoobjects have been characterized using scanning probe microscopy-based techniques, combined with various modulation schemes for enhanced sensing capabilities. The most remarkable results include: ferroelectricity of NaNbO3/Nb2O5 nanotube heterostructures, negative piezoelectric coefficient in highly anisotropic BiT mesoscopic rods, and preservation of the multiferroic character of epitaxial BFCO nanoislands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it