In vitro and in vivo Growth Hormone Responsiveness to Growth Hormone-Releasing Factor in Male and Female Zucker Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to determine whether there is an anomaly in the pituitary responsiveness to growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor in the genetically obese rat, we examined the in vitro and in vivo effects of rGRF(1-29)NH2 (GRF) on GH release in male and female Zucker rats. The effect of increasing GRF concentrations (1.56, 6.25, 12.5 25 and 50 pM) was first tested on GH release from freshly perifused anterior pituitary cells. In both sexes, the GH response per one pituitary equivalent to each GRF concentration tested was reduced in the obese group. However, when GH release was expressed as a percent of initial cell GH content, there was no difference between the lean and the obese groups. Furthermore, under pentobarbital anesthesia, GRF was injected intravenously at two consecutive doses of 0.8 and 4.0 microgram/kg body weight in obese and lean animals. In both sexes, the GH response to each dose of GRF tested was decreased in the obese group. Basal serum GH concentrations were similar in male and female obese rats compared to their respective lean siblings. In conclusion, this study demonstrates a decrease of the in vitro and in vivo pituitary response to GRF in the obese Zucker rat, suggesting a possible secondary defect at the pituitary level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".