Novel Anti-Glycan Antibodies Related to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnosis and Phenotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate whether two novel immunoglobulin A (IgA) cell wall polysaccharide antibodies, anti-laminarin (anti-L) and anti-chitin (anti-C), aid in the diagnosis and phenotype differentiation of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: A cohort of 818 individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; 517 CD and 301 UC) from two IBD tertiary referral centers, with median ages of 33 and 39 years, respectively, and disease duration of 8.9 years, were phenotyped using the Montreal classification, and analyzed for seven anti-glycan antibodies (gASCA (anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae) IgG, gASCA IgA, anti-chitobioside (GlcNAc(beta1,4)GlcNAc(beta)), anti-laminaribioside (Glc(beta1,3)Glb(beta)), anti-mannobioside (Man(alpha1,3)Man(alpha)), anti-L, and anti-C) and perinuclear atypical neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA). RESULTS: In the CD patient population, 73% were positive for >/=1 anti-glycan antibody. All glycan markers were specific for CD (85.4-97.7%) and more prevalent in CD vs. UC (P<0.0015). gASCA IgG and IgA best differentiated CD from UC followed by anti-L (area under the curve 0.818, 0.815, and 0.702, respectively). The addition of anti-L and anti-C to gASCA IgG and pANCA improved discrimination between CD and UC (P<0.001). Adding anti-L to gASCA and pANCA differentiated colonic CD and UC (P=0.02). An increasing number of positive antibodies was associated with early CD onset, penetrating phenotype, perianal disease, and the need for surgery (P<0.001). Anti-L was associated with ileocolonic CD (odds ratio (OR) 2.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-3.69; P=0.001), and anti-C with penetrating (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.50-5.04; P=0.001) and perianal disease (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.06-3.59; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-L and anti-C improve differentiation between CD and UC. Anti-L may also differentiate between isolated colonic CD and UC. Both anti-L and anti-C are independently associated with a more aggressive CD phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".