Reanalysis of a municipal landfill slope failure near Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The March 1996 slope failure in a municipal solid waste landfill near Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, is reanalyzed using continuum-mechanics-based procedures implemented in the computer programs FLAC and FLAC3D. A failure mechanism, based on the field observations of the failure, is used for the analyses. The failure mechanism is also implemented in a limit-equilibrium-based slope stability analysis computer program, SSTAB2, to simulate the observed translational character of the failure. The reanalysis results (failure surface, factor-of-safety (FoS), and displacement) from the continuum models are in general agreement with the field data. The FoS values from SSTAB2, FLAC, and FLAC3D range in the expected order. Overall, the reanalysis results supplement previously reported failure analyses. This paper serves two functions: (1) it documents the results of reanalysis using a different (from the previously published) failure mechanism hypothesis for the 1996 landfill slope failure near Cincinnati, Ohio; and (2) it demonstrates the use of 2-D and 3-D continuum models to study: (i) onset of instability; (ii) failure surface geometry and location; and (iii) displacements associated with slope failures.Key words: municipal landfill, slope failure, numerical analysis, limit equilibrium, continuum mechanics, displacement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".