Spectral and Structural Studies of Platinum Group Metal Complexes of3‐(Di‐2‐Pyridylaminomethyl)Benzamide and Formation of Mutual Intermolecular Hydrogen Bonding in Some Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The new ligand, 3‐(di‐2‐pyridylaminomethyl)benzamide, L , which carries two different coordination sites, i.e. the primary amide moiety on one side and a di‐2‐pyridylamine unit as a strong chelating group on the other side is synthesized. Reaction of chloro‐bridged dimers viz., [(η 6 ‐arene)Ru(μ‐Cl)Cl] 2 and [Cp* M (μ‐Cl)Cl] 2 with two equivalents of the ligand L in methanol followed by the addition of NH 4 BF 4 results the formation of mononuclear complexes of the formulation [(η 6 ‐arene)Ru( L )Cl]BF 4 [arene = C 6 H 6 ( 1 ), C 10 H 14 ( 2 ), C 6 Me 6 ( 3 )] and [Cp* M ( L )Cl]BF 4 [ M = Rh ( 4 ); Ir ( 5 )]. All these complexes are characterized by micro analyses, IR, and 1 H NMR spectroscopic analyses and finally by single crystal XRD study of some representative complexes. Complexes 3 and 5 show mutual intermolecular hydrogen bonding by amide–amide interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".