Circumferential variation in human second metacarpal cortical thickness: Sex, age, and mechanical factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variation in cortical thickness (CT) in four quadrants of the human second metacarpal was investigated in a sample (100 males and 72 females, skeletal age 20 to 50+ years) from a 19th-century cemetery. Both left and right elements were studied (total N = 344). Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) (for age, sex, and side, controlling for absolute size) was used to test the hypothesis of equality of thickness in the dorsal, palmar, medial, and lateral quadrants. Differences in regional CT posits localized regulation of resorption and formation adapting bone shape to functional loads, with implications for activity-modulation of skeletal senescence. The palmar cortex was found to be uniformly thicker in both sexes and both sides, and at all ages (young, middle, and old adult); the medial, lateral, and dorsal cortices did not differ significantly. Patterns of age-related loss occurring preferentially at the endocortical surface differed between men and women, with women showing significant declines across all age groups for all quadrants, and males only small decrements after middle age. The greater CT in the palmar quadrant corresponds to the region of maximum compressive strain in the second metacarpal for functions involving full flexion (grasping). Although the palmar cortex is thicker at all ages, women lose mass in that quadrant at the same rate as in other quadrants, suggesting that function does not offer protection against endocrinologically-mediated depletion of bone mass (postmenopausal osteopenia).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".