Correlates of psychotropic drug use in the elderly compared to adults aged 18–64: Results from the Quebec Health Survey
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study documents correlates of psychotropic drug use among older adults and compares the results observed in this group to those observed in individuals aged 18-64. A multivariate logistic regression analysis using data from the Quebec Health Survey (1992-1993) was employed to study predisposing and facilitating factors of this behavior. Results showed that 22% of the elderly reported having used anxiolytics, sedatives or hypnotics during the two days preceding the survey, compared to 4.9% of the respondents aged 18-64. Combining both samples, perceived health status, physical functional status, and health services utilization for psychological distress symptoms were the main health factors associated with psychotropic drug use. A significant difference was observed between the two age groups with regard to the association between the respondents' health status and the use of anxiolytics, sedatives or hypnotics. When the effect of other explanatory factors was controlled, older adults in poor health used anxiolytics, sedatives or hypnotics 2.21 times more than individuals aged 18-64 with a similar health condition, whereas older adults in good health used these drugs 7.49 times more than healthy individuals aged 18-64. Furthermore, after controlling for the effect of the respondents' physical and psychological health status, our results showed that more women than men used psychotropic drugs (OR = 1.57; 99% CI = 1.26-1.94). Low-income respondents were also more likely to report using these medications (OR = 1.53; 99% CI = 1.22-1.90). These results were interpreted as supporting the socio-cultural hypothesis of psychotropic drug use, which suggests that the prescribing and utilization of psychotropic drugs is influenced not only by symptoms but also by the social characteristics of individuals. It is suggested that future research may contribute to a better understanding of psychotropic drug utilization in the older adult community-dwelling population by examining consumers' attitudes and health care providers' social values concerning the appropriateness of this behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".