Congestive Heart Failure after Myocardial Infarction in the Rat: Cardiac Force and Spontaneous Sarcomere Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The causes of reduced cardiac force development in congestive heart failure (CHF) are still uncertain. We explored the subcellular mechanisms leading to decreased force development in trabeculae from rats with a myocardial infarction. We defined CHF according to clinical and pathological criteria and compared properties of trabeculae from animals with CHF (cMI) to those of animals with a myocardial scar but without evidence of CHF (uMI), and sham-operated animals. The new findings of this study on properties of cMI trabeculae are that (1) maximal twitch force following post-extrasystolic potentiation is unchanged; (2) the sensitivity of cMI trabeculae to [Ca(2+)](o) is increased; (3) spontaneous diastolic sarcomere length (SL) fluctuations (SA) are increased in cMI at all levels of SR Ca(2+) loading; and (4) SA is accompanied by a proportional reduction of F(max). The results suggest that the probability of spontaneous diastolic opening of SR Ca(2+) channels is increased in CHF. These data provide the basis for a novel mechanism underlying systolic and diastolic dysfunction as well as arrhythmias in hearts in CHF. If SA proves to be a component of myocardial dysfunction in human CHF, our thinking about therapy of the patient with CHF may be profoundly changed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".