MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2058555983 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-672

Abstract 672: PBI-1402, a first-in-class erythropoiesis regulating agent, inhibits tumor growth and metastasis of murine mastocytoma and does not overshoot hemoglobin: Comparison with erythropoietin

2011· article· en· W2058555983 on OpenAlexaff
Lyne Gagnon, François Sarra‐Bournet, Lilianne Geerts, Kathy Hince, Mouna Lagraoui, Pierre Laurin, Christopher Penney, Brigitte Grouix

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsLiminal BioSciences (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineErythropoietinMastocytomaMetastasisAnemiaHemoglobinInternal medicineErythropoiesisEndocrinologyCancerHematocritPharmacologyCancer researchTumor cells

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: PBI-1402 reduces the need for transfusion and increases hemoglobin (Hb) level and red blood cell count (RBC) in chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) by a mechanism of action distinct from erythropoietin (EPO). AIM: The objective was to compare the effect of PBI-1402 and EPO on modulation of tumor growth. METHODS: The effect of PBI-1402 (200 mg/kg, oral, once a day) or EPO (200 or 2000 U/kg, s.c. injection, twice a week) was studied in a subcutaneous P815 mastocytoma model. P815 cells express both PBI-1402 and EPO receptors. Tumor growth, metastasis, serum nitric oxide (NO) and hematocrit (Ht) were assessed. RESULTS: P815 tumor growth is rapid and metastasizes to the liver. Inflammation is also associated with P815 tumor growth. PBI-1402 significantly reduced tumor growth (T/C=37%) and invasion as demonstrated by a 33% reduction of mice with liver metastasis. In comparison, EPO had no effect (200 U/kg, equivalent dose used in CKD treatment). However, high dose EPO (2000 U/kg, equivalent dose used in human cancer treatment) exacerbated tumor growth (T/C: 135%). Both doses of EPO induced a significant increase in the percentage of mice with liver metastasis (2X, 200 U/kg, and 3X, 2000 U/kg) compared to control. PBI-1402 treatment had no effect on NO and did not overshoot normal hematocrit. However, treatment with high dose EPO significantly increased NO and Ht levels (Table 1). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that oral treatment with PBI-1402 may inhibit growth and metastasis of cancer cells. As an important safety feature, PBI-1402 does not induce overshoot of hemoglobin. In contrast to EPO, PBI-1402 may offer the advantage of reducing tumor growth and metastasis while preventing anemia induced by chemotherapy. In conclusion, PBI-1402 has the potential to be a safe erythropoiesis-regulating agent useful in treating anemia in cancer patients. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 672. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-672

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment→French-language works237,207→