Oncolytic Vesicular Stomatitis Viruses Are Potent Agents for Intravesical Treatment of High-Risk Bladder Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bladder cancer is the second most common genitourinary malignancy. At initial diagnosis, approximately 70% of cases are non-muscle-invasive; however, current treatment options for superficial disease are of limited efficacy because many patients will develop recurrent tumors. The purpose of this study was to examine two replication-competent oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) strains as intravesical agents in an orthotopic murine model of high-grade bladder cancer. Four human bladder cancer cell lines (RT4, MGH-U3, UM-UC3, and KU-7) were treated with either wild-type VSV or a mutant Delta51M variant (AV3) in vitro. Both wild-type VSV and AV3, which has an impaired ability to shutdown innate immunity, preferentially killed the more aggressive, IFN-nonresponsive cell lines UM-UC3 and KU-7, whereas IFN-responsive RT4 and MGH-U3 cells were less susceptible. In vivo, KU-7-luc bladder tumor cells, which stably express firefly luciferase, were inoculated into nude mice by intravesical instillation and tumor growth was quantified using bioluminescence imaging. Mice with established xenografts were administered VSV intravesically on days 4, 9, and 14, and necropsy was performed after 3 weeks. AV3 as well as wild-type VSV significantly inhibited KU-7-luc tumor growth by 90% (AV3) and 98% (wild-type), respectively, as compared with controls treated with UV-inactivated VSV. Despite using immunocompromised hosts, there was no evidence of toxicity in either group. In conclusion, VSV instillation therapy showed promising antitumor activity and safety in an orthotopic model of bladder cancer. These findings provide preclinical proof-of-principle for the intravesical use of VSV against non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, especially in IFN-refractory patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".