MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058578918 · doi:10.1117/12.869576

Room temperature transport measurements on Bridgman-grown CuInSe 2 with added sodium

2010· article· en· W2058578918 on OpenAlexaff
H.F. Myers, C.H. Champness, I. Shih

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmpouleStoichiometryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Seebeck coefficientScanning electron microscopeElectrical resistivity and conductivityHall effectMaterials scienceIngotSodiumCrystallographyChemistryMineralogyNuclear chemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermoelectric power, Hall coefficient and resistivity measurements were carried out on material cut from monocrystalline ingots of CuInSe2. The ingots were grown using a vertical-Bridgman procedure, whereby Cu, In and Se were melted and directionally cooled within a sealed quartz ampoule. When stoichiometric proportions of the starting elements were used, the material was always p-type, with hole concentrations of the order of 1017-1018 cm-3. However, the incorporation of a sufficient amount of sodium (0.3 at. %) into the melt was seen to result in n-type material, with electron concentrations of the order of 1016. This conversion from p to n was hindered by the inclusion Se above stoichiometry into the ampoule, and more Na was required for the material to change type. The mobility of the p-type samples, with low sodium additions (0-0.2 at. %), was on average 17 cm2V-1s-1, and was seen to be higher for material grown from melts containing excess Se, corresponding to the chemical formula CuInSe2.2, than from stoichiometry. SEM/EDX (Scanning electron microscope / Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy) analysis of the ingots after growth indicated no sodium residing within the interior of the bulk material, but a significant amount was found on the exterior surface in the case of an ingot grown with CuInSe2.05 and 5 at. % Na. Various deposits found within the ampoules after growth were analyzed, including a copper-rich precipitate found only in ampoules which included a high concentration of Na and a low concentration of excess Se, resulting in n-type material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207