MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058591139 · doi:10.1177/0194599811399556

What Are Thyroidectomy Patients Really Concerned About?

2011· article· en· W2058591139 on OpenAlex
Lara Abdul‐Sater, Mélissa Henry, Agnieszka Majdan, Tamara Mijović, Jason Franklin, Michael G. Brandt, Martin J. Black, Michael Hier, Richard J. Payne

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueOtolaryngology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreWestern UniversityJewish General HospitalMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsVarimax rotationPsychosocialThyroidectomyMedicineFeelingGeneral surgeryThyroidPsychometricsClinical psychologyPsychologyPsychiatryInternal medicineCronbach's alphaSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To better appreciate perioperative concerns affecting patients considering thyroidectomy and to understand how they may vary according to patient characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The authors recruited patients scheduled for thyroid surgery at the McGill University Thyroid Cancer Center. A total of 148 patients completed the 18-item Western Surgical Concern Inventory-Thyroid (WSCI-T) questionnaire. Psychometrics of the WSCI-T were assessed through a principal component analysis with varimax rotation and reliability analyses. Independent-samples t tests and 2-tailed Pearson correlations were ran, identifying areas of elevated concerns and their relationship to gender, age, and surgical procedure (total vs hemithyroidectomy). RESULTS: The principal component analysis revealed the presence of 3 domains of presurgical concerns on the WSCI-T:Surgery-Related Concerns, Psychosocial Concerns, and Daily-Living Concerns. Reliability coefficients for the WSCI-T Total and subscales were satisfactory. Responses on the WSCI-T indicated on average a moderate overall level of concerns before thyroidectomy. Surgery-Related Concerns was the highest domain of concerns, followed by Daily-Living and Psychosocial Concerns, respectively. Patients were mainly worried about the nodule being cancerous, experiencing a change in voice, and surgical complications. Areas of minor concern included being judged or treated differently, becoming depressed, and feeling embarrassed. Women had higher overall levels of concern than men did. Although there were no significant differences in overall levels of concern according to age and surgical procedure, differences were noted at a subscale and item level. CONCLUSION: This study establishes a mean that will permit adequate physician counseling and a better management of patients' perioperative worries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it