MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058602204 · doi:10.5430/air.v1n1p96

Parallel hybrid enhanced inherited GA based scuc in a distributed cluster

2012· article· en· W2058602204 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christopher Columbus C, Sishaj P. Simon

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Intelligence Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScheduleEconomic dispatchPower system simulationComputer scienceGenetic algorithmOperator (biology)Mathematical optimizationPower (physics)Electric power systemMathematicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the deregulated electricity market, secure operation is an enduring concern of the independent system operator (ISO). For a secure and economical hourly generation schedule of the day ahead market, ISO executes the security constrained unit commitment (SCUC) problem. In this paper, a new formulation of SCUC problem, considering more practical constraints are presented. The proposed SCUC formulation includes constraints, such as hourly power demand, system reserves, ramp up/down limits, minimum ON/OFF duration limits. Unlike the traditional SCUC techniques the proposed method solves the Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) from the UC. To solve such SCUC model, a hybrid solution method consists of an enhanced inherited genetic algorithm (EIGA) is used for unit commitment master problem and Lambda relaxation method is used for the economic dispatch sub-problem. The message passing interface (MPI) based technique is used to implement the hybrid EIGA in distributed memory model. The time complexity and the solution quality with respect to the number of processors in a cluster are thoroughly analyzed. The effectiveness of the proposed method to solve the SCUC problem is shown on different test systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtificial Intelligence ResearchSame topicElectric Power System OptimizationFrench-language works237,207