MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058609535 · doi:10.1118/1.1405844

Investigation of a direct conversion flat panel imager for portal imaging

2001· article· en· W2058609535 on OpenAlexaff
Geordi Pang, D. L. Lee, J. A. Rowlands

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsDetective quantum efficiencyFlat panel detectorFlat panelOpticsImage qualityDetectorImage sensorPixelLine (geometry)Medical imagingX-ray detectorPhysicsMaterials scienceNuclear medicineComputer scienceComputer visionImage (mathematics)MedicineArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flat-panel based x-ray imaging is an emerging new technology that could be used to significantly improve the quality of on-line portal imagers. There are two types of flat panel imagers: direct and indirect conversion. Previous experimental work on flat panel detectors for portal imaging application used indirect-conversion imagers. In this paper, a direct-conversion amorphous-selenium flat panel imager is investigated for application in portal imaging. The imager has an active imaging area of 14 in. X 17 in., i.e., 3072 X 2560 pixels each with dimensions 139 microm X 139 microm. The spatial frequency dependent detective quantum efficiency of the imager has been measured for a 6 MV beam and found to be amongst the best area detectors investigated for on-line portal imaging. Effects of changing pixel size, as well as possible improvements to both the image quality and convenience of operation are discussed. Comparison with an indirect conversion flat panel imager is also included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingFrench-language works237,207