SAFETY OF ARCHAEOSOME ADJUVANTS EVALUATED IN A MOUSE MODEL*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Archaeosomes, liposomes prepared from the polar ether lipids extracted from Archaea, demonstrate great potential as immunomodulating carriers of soluble antigens, promoting humoral and cell mediated immunity in the vaccinated host. The safety of unilamellar archaeosomes prepared from the total polar lipids (TPL) of Halobacterium salinarum, Methanobrevibacter smithii or Thermoplasma acidophilum was evaluated in female BALB/c mice using ovalbumin (OVA) as the model antigen. Groups of 6-8 mice were injected (0.1 mL final volume) subcutaneously at 0 and 21 days, with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), 11 microg OVA in PBS, 1.25 mg of antigen-free archaeosomes in PBS (ca 70 mg/kg body wt), or PBS containing 11-20 microg OVA encapsulated in 1.25mg archaeosomes. Animals were monitored daily for injection site reactions, body weight,temperature and clinical signs of adverse reactions. Sera were collected on days 1, 2, 22, and 39 for analyses of creatine phosphokinase. Mice were sacrificed on 39 d, sera were collected for biochemical analyses, and major organs (liver, spleen, kidneys, heart, lungs) were weighed and examined macroscopically. There were no indications of adverse reactions or toxicity associated with any of the archaeosome adjuvants. None of the antigen-free archaeosomes elicited significant anti lipid antibodies when subcutaneously injected (1 mg each at 0, 1, 2, and 4 weeks) in mice, although anti H. salinarum lipid antibodies were detected. These antilipid antibodies cross-reacted with the TPL of T. acidophilum archaeosomes but not with the TPL of M. smithii archaeosomes nor with lipids of ester liposomes made from L-alpha-dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC), L-alpha-dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol (DMPG), and cholesterol (CHOL). In vitro hemolysis assay on mouse erythrocytes indicated no lysis with M. smithii or T. acidophilum archaeosomes at up to 2.5 mg/mL concentration. At this concentration, H. salinarum archaeosomes and DMPC/DMPG/CHOL ester liposomes caused about 2% and 4% hemolysis, respectively. Based on this mouse model evaluation, archaeosomes are well-tolerated and appear relatively safe for potential vaccine applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".