MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058610837 · doi:10.1081/lpr-120016712

SAFETY OF ARCHAEOSOME ADJUVANTS EVALUATED IN A MOUSE MODEL*

2002· article· en· W2058610837 on OpenAlex
G. B. Patel, Abdelwahab Omri, Lise Deschatelets, G. Dennis Sprott

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Liposome Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdjuvantLiposomeAntigenBiochemistryOvalbuminBiologyAntibodyMolecular biologyPharmacologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Archaeosomes, liposomes prepared from the polar ether lipids extracted from Archaea, demonstrate great potential as immunomodulating carriers of soluble antigens, promoting humoral and cell mediated immunity in the vaccinated host. The safety of unilamellar archaeosomes prepared from the total polar lipids (TPL) of Halobacterium salinarum, Methanobrevibacter smithii or Thermoplasma acidophilum was evaluated in female BALB/c mice using ovalbumin (OVA) as the model antigen. Groups of 6-8 mice were injected (0.1 mL final volume) subcutaneously at 0 and 21 days, with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), 11 microg OVA in PBS, 1.25 mg of antigen-free archaeosomes in PBS (ca 70 mg/kg body wt), or PBS containing 11-20 microg OVA encapsulated in 1.25mg archaeosomes. Animals were monitored daily for injection site reactions, body weight,temperature and clinical signs of adverse reactions. Sera were collected on days 1, 2, 22, and 39 for analyses of creatine phosphokinase. Mice were sacrificed on 39 d, sera were collected for biochemical analyses, and major organs (liver, spleen, kidneys, heart, lungs) were weighed and examined macroscopically. There were no indications of adverse reactions or toxicity associated with any of the archaeosome adjuvants. None of the antigen-free archaeosomes elicited significant anti lipid antibodies when subcutaneously injected (1 mg each at 0, 1, 2, and 4 weeks) in mice, although anti H. salinarum lipid antibodies were detected. These antilipid antibodies cross-reacted with the TPL of T. acidophilum archaeosomes but not with the TPL of M. smithii archaeosomes nor with lipids of ester liposomes made from L-alpha-dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC), L-alpha-dimyristoylphosphatidylglycerol (DMPG), and cholesterol (CHOL). In vitro hemolysis assay on mouse erythrocytes indicated no lysis with M. smithii or T. acidophilum archaeosomes at up to 2.5 mg/mL concentration. At this concentration, H. salinarum archaeosomes and DMPC/DMPG/CHOL ester liposomes caused about 2% and 4% hemolysis, respectively. Based on this mouse model evaluation, archaeosomes are well-tolerated and appear relatively safe for potential vaccine applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it