Expression and cellular localization of the classical progesterone receptor in healthy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis affected spinal cord
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have suggested that elevated progesterone levels are associated with a slower disease course in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Given that the effects of progesterone are mediated in part by the classical progesterone receptor (PR), the expression and cellular localization of the A and B isoforms (PR-A and PR-B, respectively) of the PR in control (neuropathologically normal) and ALS-affected spinal cord (SC) were examined. METHODS: Semi-quantitative RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence analyses of the cervical and lumbar SC of post-mortem ALS patients (n = 19) and control subjects (n = 10) were performed. Primers and antibodies used allowed the detection of both PR-A and PR-B isoforms together (PR-A+B) or PR-B isoform alone. RESULTS: Lumbar PR-A+B and cervical PR-B mRNA expression were significantly higher in ALS than controls. In both ALS and controls, PR-A+B immunoreactivity (IR) was occasionally detected in motor neurons. In contrast, PR-A+B IR was prominent in axonal processes and vessels. This was more evident in nerve roots and large arteries in ALS compared with controls. Colocalization of PR-A+B with markers of neurons, axonal processes and vascular endothelium was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence that both PR-A and PR-B isoforms are expressed in the human SC is provided, with some regional variation in isoform expression between ALS and controls. The IR was more prominent in nerve roots and large arteries in ALS, suggesting a potential role in the degenerative process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".