Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Employing the recent XC(fit) intermolecular potential for H 2 ‐Ar, we have presented the results of the spectral parameters for the D 2 ‐Ar Raman Q 1 branch, obtained from quantum mechanical close‐coupled calculations. While the theoretical line shifts of the polarized Raman spectra were found to agree with experiments, the corresponding widths were smaller than the measured values by as much as 56%. We observed that the shifts and the widths depend on the vibrational dependence of the potential in their own separate ways, and our results suggested that the anisotropic vibrational dependence of the XC(fit) potential requires improvement, in conjunction with further fine‐tuning of the isotropic part. Even though there is no experimental data for comparison, we have computed the line‐mixing parameters of the polarized Raman Q 1 branch, as well as the depolarized line widths and shifts for the Q 1 ( j ) lines. These results showed the same trends as the corresponding ones for D 2 ‐He.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".