MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058735359 · doi:10.1002/mrdd.20029

Lennox–Gastaut syndrome: Potential mechanisms of cognitive regression

2004· review· en· W2058735359 on OpenAlexaff
Warren T. Blume

Bibliographic record

VenueMental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscienceEpilepsyCognitionPsychologyLennox–Gastaut syndromeEpilepsy syndromesCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lennox-Gastaut (L-G) syndrome is an intractable generalized epilepsy of childhood onset, associated with spike waves at a slow rate and paroxysmal fast activity. These epileptiform discharge patterns are thought to reflect excessive neocortical excitability and arise from neuronal and synaptic features peculiar to the immature central nervous system. The epileptic processes associated with L-G syndrome may lead to enduring patterns of abnormal activity and connectivity. These abnormal patterns compete with normal developmental mechanisms and may result in subsequent impairment and/or regression of cognition. Recurring or prolonged seizures themselves may also damage the brain. We hypothesize that the presence of slow spike waves diverts the brain from normal developmental processes toward seizure-preventing mechanisms. Adding to this burden, antiepileptic medications, sleep disruption, and social isolation all retard cognitive development and the learning process at a crucial time of brain maturation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.257
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research ReviewsSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207