MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058740848 · doi:10.4021/gr215e

Concomitant Rupture of Hydatid Cyst of Liver in Hepatic Duct and Gallbladder: Case Report

2010· article· en· W2058740848 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Imtiaz Wani

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParasitic infections in humans and animals
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGallbladderEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyMagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographyBiliary fistulaCommon hepatic ductIntrahepatic bile ductsCholecystectomyRadiologyConcomitantCommon bile ductHydatid cystBile ductCystic ductCystFistulaGeneral surgerySurgeryPancreatitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydatid cyst liver rupture into the biliary tree may involve the common hepatic duct, lobar biliary branches, the small intrahepatic bile ducts or rarely the gallbladder. Rupture can be occult or frank. A frank intrabiliary rupture of hepatic hydatid cyst is a rare but serious event. The authors are reporting a case of concomitant rupture of hydatid cyst of liver into right hepatic duct and the gallbladder. A 50-year-old female patient who presented with acute cholangitis was confirmed as a case of intrabilary rupture on ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Rupture of hydatid cyst of liver in right hepatic and the gallbladder was confirmed on surgery. Suture repair of cystobiliary fistula, choledochoduodenostomy with cholecystectomy was done.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0080.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterology ResearchSame topicParasitic infections in humans and animalsFrench-language works237,207