MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dynamic Hysteretic Characteristics of High-Strength Steels (POSTEN60, POSTEN80) and Application of a Dynamic Hysteresis Model to FE Analysis

2013· article· en· W2058781972 on OpenAlexaff
Kyong-Ho Chang, Gab-Chul Jang, S. F. Stiemer, Loewen Nathan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceFinite element methodHysteresisUltimate tensile strengthStructural engineeringDeformation (meteorology)High strength steelPlasticityDynamic loadingComposite materialMetallurgyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As steel structures become larger, taller, and longer, the demand for high-strength steel increases. High-strength steels exhibit different mechanical characteristics and hysteretic behavior for dynamic deformation than for quasi-static deformation. This is attributable to the strain rate and temperature dependence of steel materials when nonuniformly deformed in the plastic region. Therefore, to analyze and design structures using high-strength steels under dynamic cyclic loading, such as earthquake loading, it is necessary to consider the special dynamic hysteresis model of high-strength steels. In particular, when using finite-element (FE) analysis programs one should use the proper material characteristics for those steels. In this paper, dynamic hysteresis models for standard high-strength steels, with tensile strengths of 600 and 800 MPa, are formulated based on results of tensile tests and low-cycle fatigue tests over a range of strain rates from 10−4−10 s−1. A three-dimensional elastic-plastic finite-element analysis program using a newly formulated dynamic hysteresis model is developed by the writers. Accuracy and validity of the developed finite-element analysis program is verified by correlation of the analytical and experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials in Civil EngineeringSame topicStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207