MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Newly Characterized <i>SCN5A</i> Mutation Underlying Brugada Syndrome Unmasked by Hyperthermia

2003· article· en· W2058806363 on OpenAlexaff
Ngai‐Shing Mok, Silvia G. Priori, Carlo Napolitano, Mohamed Chahine, Ghayath Baroudi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrugada syndromeMedicineFlecainideST elevationInternal medicineCardiologyVentricular fibrillationHyperthermiaAtrial fibrillationElectrocardiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Febrile illness has been rarely reported to modulate ST segment elevation in right precordial leads on ECG or even precipitate ventricular fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome. We report the case of a patient whose Brugada ECG pattern was unmasked by hyperthermia secondary to acute cholangitis. Serial ECGs showed progressive attenuation of ST segment elevation as body temperature gradually returned to normal. Structural heart disease was ruled out. Intravenous flecainide injection reproduced a less remarkable ST segment elevation. Genetic screening demonstrated a single amino acid substitution (H681P) in the SCN5A gene, thus confirming the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome. In vitro expression of this newly characterized genetic defect revealed novel biophysical abnormalities consisting of a shift in both steady-state activation and inactivation, resulting in a 60% reduction of sodium window current. Thus, SCN5A-H681P mutation induces a significant loss of transmembrane current and is clinically associated with a pathologic phenotype that is elicited by hyperthermia. Overall the observed clinical features are in agreement with previous observations and strongly suggest that fever may be an environmental modifier among Brugada syndrome patients with a detrimental (and possibly arrhythmogenic) effect on cardiac repolarization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular ElectrophysiologySame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207