AN ALTERNATIVE THERMODILUTION METHOD TO MEASURE CARDIAC OUTPUT IN A RAT MODEL OF STAGNANT HYPOXIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rats are often used to study hemodynamics in animal research. We have established an alternative method to measure cardiac output in a conscious rat using a thermodilution technique via a left ventricular injection. The validity of this method was evaluated in conscious rats and compared with the results obtained using the radiolabeled microspheres (reference sample method). Using 20 male Sprague-Dawley rats, a baseline cardiac index was measured by thermodilution to determine the baseline cardiac index and to evaluate between animal variability. The baseline cardiac index was compared to the reference sample method with 6 rats. Following baseline measurements, an intra-atrial balloon was inflated in a stepwise manner to create 2 to 3 different cardiac outputs, and the cardiac index was computed. For each measurement, the cardiac index was first measured by thermodilution and immediately followed by the reference sample method. A total of 21 measurements were obtained, and the results were analyzed by a Bland-Altman plot and the correlation coefficient was calculated. Although the agreement between the two methods was poor, both methods had a good correlation (r2 = 0.59). With the thermodilution technique, we demonstrated a small coefficient of variation in each measurement, with a low intra-animal and inter-animal variability. As there is no gold standard method to measure cardiac output in rats, we believe that left ventricular thermodilution is a reliable method, and overcomes several technical difficulties such as heat loss, one of the significant limitations of the conventional thermodilution method (via right atrial injection). This new thermodilution technique (via the left ventricle) is therefore an attractive alternative method to measure cardiac output in rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".