MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058960545 · doi:10.1002/dvdy.20225

Pronephric regulation of acid–base balance; Coexpression of carbonic anhydrase type 2 and sodium‐bicarbonate cotransporter‐1 in the late distal segment

2005· article· en· W2058960545 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaolan Zhou, Peter D. Vize

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Dynamics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBicarbonateBiologyCarbonic anhydraseCotransporterCell biologyKidneySodiumCarbonic anhydrase IITransporterBiochemistryEndocrinologyChemistryEnzymeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The kidney plays a critical role in regulating the composition of the blood, including pH. The major buffer regulating pH of the blood is bicarbonate. Bicarbonate is freely filtered through the glomerulus and must be recovered from the primary filtrate to maintain appropriate buffering capacity and blood pH. In this report, the expression of carbonic anhydrase type 2 within the late distal segment of pronephroi is described. This expression precisely overlaps that of the sodium-bicarbonate transporter XNBC1. In mammalian kidneys, these two proteins collaborate in the transepithelial recovery of bicarbonate from the kidney filtrate. Coexpression of the genes encoding these proteins in Xenopus embryos indicates that pronephroi use the same recovery system and that this system is largely localized to the late portion of the pronephric distal segment. Not only do the simple pronephroi regulate water and solute balance, they also appear to regulate blood pH in a manner akin to that of the vastly more complex mammalian metanephric kidneys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental DynamicsSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207