A Fok I/DNA Machine that Duplicates its Analyte Gene Sequence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A method for the amplified analysis of a gene sequence by a Fok I/DNA machine is described. A tailored nucleic acid that includes a recognition sequence for the analyzed gene and a hybridized sequence of the gene itself acting as the "fuel" substrate of the "machine". Upon recognition of the gene by the "fuel" substrate, the autonomous Fok I-induced cleavage of the resulting duplex proceeds, resulting in the duplication of the gene sequence and the horseradish peroxidase mimicking hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme as a chemiluminescence reporter. The autonomous duplication of the gene sequence and the catalytic activity of the DNAzyme provide a double amplification path that enables the analysis of target DNA with a detection limit of 1 x 10(-14) M.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it