MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2058986242 · doi:10.1002/app.23890

Grafting of ethylene–ethyl acrylate–maleic anhydride terpolymer with amino‐terminated polydimethylsiloxane during reactive processing

2006· article· en· W2058986242 on OpenAlexaff
Neil T. McManus, Shipei Zhu, Costas Tzoganakis, Alexander Penlidis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaleic anhydrideMaterials sciencePolydimethylsiloxanePolymer chemistryGraftingAcetoneEthyl acrylateCopolymerPolymerSolubilityChemical engineeringAcrylateOrganic chemistryChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An ethylene–ethyl acrylate–maleic anhydride copolymer (EEAMA) is grafted with aminopropyl polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) via melt reactive mixing at 140°C. The materials produced split into two components based on their solubility in acetone. The acetone soluble material is highly enriched in PDMS, whereas the insoluble material contains levels of PDMS that are lower than the proportions added to the reaction mixture. It was found that for all reaction mixtures the PDMS content in the acetone insoluble solids increases with mixing time. Molecular weight distributions of materials become narrower as the amount of PDMS increases. Rheological testing shows that the level of PDMS in the mixtures and the presence of the acetone soluble fractions give rise to significant changes in the complex viscosity and elastic moduli for the polymers. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 4230–4237, 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicPolymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207