MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059027782 · doi:10.1002/uog.8910

Allantoic cysts and posterior urethral valves: a case report

2010· article· en· W2059027782 on OpenAlexaff
Mariève Bureau, Stéphane Bolduc

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUrachusUmbilical cordFetusCystSurgeryPosterior urethral valveUrinary systemHydronephrosisAllantoisPregnancyEtiologyAnatomyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allantoic cysts are a somewhat rare entity. They are identifiable on antenatal ultrasound examination but are not easily distinguishable from pseudocysts, which are often associated with a poor prognosis. Their etiology remains obscure and obstructive uropathies have been proposed to be one of the underlying mechanisms. We report on a case in which both allantoic cysts and a patent urachus were detected antenatally and turned out to be associated with posterior urethral valves (PUV). The cysts were first seen in the early second trimester, with a full fetal bladder and patent urachus. They disappeared by the 29(th) week. During the subsequent sonographic examinations, the bladder was emptying regularly. The kidneys remained normal throughout the pregnancy. It is hypothesized that the increased pressure within the urinary tract kept the urachus patent, led to the formation of allantoic cysts and, later, to their perforation; this allowed the fetus to empty his bladder and kept him from the usual complications of PUV. This case emphasizes the importance of detection and characterization of umbilical cord cysts on antenatal ultasound examination and suggests that obstructive uropathies should be included in the differential diagnosis of umbilical cord cyst communicating with the fetal bladder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207