MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059112153 · doi:10.1002/jso.20724

Germline MYH mutations in a clinic‐based series of Canadian multiple colorectal adenoma patients

2007· article· en· W2059112153 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marina E. Croitoru, Sean P. Cleary, Terri Berk, Nando Di Nicola, Ilana Kopolovic, Bharati Bapat, Steven Gallinger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surgical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai Hospital
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMUTYHMedicineGermline mutationGermlineMutationCompound heterozygosityAlleleGeneColorectal adenomaGeneticsCancer researchColorectal cancerBiologyCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: MYH is a member of the DNA base excision repair (BER) pathway and mutations of this gene predispose to the development of colorectal neoplasia in an autosomal recessive transmission pattern. Our objective was to determine the significance of MYH mutations in a series of Canadian patients with multiple adenomas. METHODS: We screened for germline MYH mutations (by dHPLCO) in 20 clinic-based multiple adenoma patients who were adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutation-negative. Suspected mutations were confirmed by sequence analysis. RESULTS: Six of 20 (30%) patients carried pathogenic biallelic MYH mutations, 1 Y165C homozygote and 5 compound heterozygotes of other sequence variants. We identified three novel variants, Q377X, 1314delA, and P281L, which are likely pathogenic. Twenty-nine relatives of the Y90X/1103delC compound heterozygous carrier were also screened for germline MYH mutations, and 1 homozygous and 14 heterozygous carriers were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with multiple adenomas, biallelic MYH mutations account for approximately 30% of APC mutation negative cases and two thirds of these carry mutations other than the "common" Y165C and G382D variants. Clinical screening algorithms which focus only on the Y165C and G382D alleles are inadequate since additional pathogenic mutations may be identified by screening the entire gene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Surgical OncologySame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207