Analysis of the effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy during acute HIV-1 infection on HIV-specific CD4 T cell functions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been reported that antiretroviral therapy (HAART) during acute HIV-1 infection may rescue HIV-1-specific CD4 T cell responses. OBJECTIVE: To determine the duration of this preserved response by investigating the long-term effects of HAART during acute infection on HIV-specific CD4 T cell function related to possible immune control during subsequent therapy interruption. METHODS: A longitudinal analysis followed HIV-specific CD4 T cell reactivity in 17 individuals with well-documented acute HIV-1 infection where five out of 11 HAART-treated patients stopped therapy and six were untreated. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with overlapping peptide pools derived from Gag and Nef. Production of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) by CD4 T cells was analysed together with proliferative responses. RESULTS: Absolute numbers, but not percentages, of Gag-specific IFN-gamma-, IL-2- or IFN-gamma/IL-2-producing CD4 T cells were increased in treated compared with untreated individuals up to 2 years after seroconversion. HAART during acute HIV-1 infection was associated with lower viral load but did not result in increased proliferation of HIV-specific CD4 T cells. One out of five individuals who discontinued therapy showed evidence for immune control. However, patients who failed to control viraemia also had measurable proliferative HIV-specific CD4 T cell responses and preserved numbers of cytokine-producing CD4 T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Early HAART during acute HIV-1 infection resulted in higher numbers of HIV-specific IFN-gamma- and IL-2-producing CD4 T cells, but this preservation in four out of five patients was not associated with control of viraemia upon treatment interruption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".