MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Unambiguous identification of recombination lines in single zinc-blende ZnSe nanowires in direct relation to their microstructure

2013· article· en· W2059206293 on OpenAlexafffund
Ankur Saxena, Qi Pan, Harry E. Ruda

Bibliographic record

VenueNanotechnology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsNanowirePhotoluminescenceMaterials scienceExcitonSpontaneous emissionPhononCondensed matter physicsOptoelectronicsOpticsLaserPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present results on the low-temperature photoluminescence characterization of individual ZnSe nanowires, whose crystal structure was determined to be zinc-blende by transmission electron microscopy on the same individual nanowires as were studied optically. The photoluminescence response from single ZnSe nanowires was found to be dominated by excitonic emission due to native point defects, while no emission peaks related to the unintentional impurities were detected. Two strong photoluminescence lines were observed at 2.785 eV and 2.780 eV, assigned to the excitons bound to deep neutral acceptors related to the vacancies of Zn (V(Zn)) and complexes of V(Zn), respectively. Another recombination peak at 2.800 eV related to the free exciton emission in ZnSe was also observed. Longitudinal optical-phonon replicas of up to three orders were seen for both lines, and the average number of emitted phonons was also determined. The excitonic emission linewidths of 1.5 meV were observed from individual nanowires, which are the narrowest excitonic linewidths reported so far for ZnSe nanowires. The optical response from a single nanowire was also compared to that from a bundle of nanowires, and it was found that the linewidths of excitonic emission from the bundle of nanowires were slightly larger than those from single nanowires, due to the effects of ensemble broadening. It is also suggested that in the case of a bundle of nanowires, the broadening is limited by the nanowire which exhibits the largest excitonic linewidth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanotechnologySame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207