MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059213178 · doi:10.1080/01904160802531001

Response of Determinate and Indeterminate Common Bean Genotypes to<i>Rhizobium</i>Inoculant in a Short Season Rainfed Production System in the Canadian Prairie

2009· article· en· W2059213178 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Thandiwe Nleya, F.L. Walley, Albert Vandenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plant Nutrition · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersSaskatchewan Pulse GrowersMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsPhaseolusMicrobial inoculantNitrogen fixationHabitBiologyRhizobiumIndeterminate growthAgronomySymbiosisGrowing seasonYield (engineering)CultivarHorticultureInoculation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) has been shown to be a poor di-nitrogen (N2) fixer and nitrogen (N) fertilizers are usually recommended in bean production. Recent research results suggest that the success of the bean/Rhizobium symbiosis may depend, in part, on the specific bean genotype. Twelve dry bean genotypes differing in growth habit, commercial class, and maturity were evaluated for N2 fixation in field experiments. Response to inoculant application was highly influenced by environmental conditions. Genotypes differed in nodule dry mass, seed yield, seed N yield, and in amount of N2 fixed. Growth habit alone was not adequate in classifying bean genotypes for N2 fixation. The actual amount of N2 fixed was low ranging from 16 kg ha−1 to 27 kg ha−1, suggesting that the symbiotic process alone may not provide adequate N for optimum seed yield in dry environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plant NutritionSame topicLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisFrench-language works237,207