MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The cytoplasmic linker protein CLIP-170 is a human autoantigen

2002· article· en· W2059223606 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin J. Griffith, J Ryan, Marvin J. Fritzler

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical & Experimental Immunology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecombinant DNABiologyMolecular biologyImmunoprecipitationComplementary DNAFusion proteinAntibodyAutoantibodycDNA libraryCytoplasmMonoclonal antibodyImmunofluorescenceEpitopeImmunologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to identify autoantigens that are recognized by human sera and are associated with a speckled cytoplasmic fluorescent staining pattern on tissue culture cells, and to determine clinical features associated with specific autoantibodies. A serum from a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus was used to identify a 3.7-kb cDNA insert from a HeLa cell expression library. The purified cDNA (VLK2.1) encoded a peptide of 1051 amino acids that shared 98.4% similarity with the carboxyl terminal portion of a previously reported 170 kD protein named cytoplasmic linker protein-170 (CLIP-170). Antibodies affinity purified with the recombinant CLIP-170 protein, the prototype human serum and a monoclonal antibody raised against CLIP-170 exhibited identical speckled staining of the cytoplasm in HEp-2 cells. The human autoantibodies reacted with the purified recombinant protein in a Western immunoblot and immunoprecipitated the in vitro translated recombinant protein. Three additional human sera also immunoprecipitated the recombinant CLIP-170 protein. The clinical diagnoses in these patients were limited scleroderma, glioblastoma and idiopathic pleural effusion. This is the first report that identifies CLIP-170 as a human autoantigen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical & Experimental ImmunologySame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207