Relaxant responses to calcium channel antagonists and potassium channel opener in human saphenous vein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1.-- As shown in a parallel study the magnitude of depolarization induced in human saphenous vein by raising external potassium ([K(+)](e)) falls markedly below the theoretical values predicted by the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equations. This anomaly prompted us to re-examine the relaxant actions of L-type (nifedipine) and T-type (mibefradil) Ca(2+) channel antagonists, and relaxant and electrophysiological effects of the K(+) channel opener, pinacidil, on saphenous veins contracted by the elevation of [K(+)](e). 2.-- Nifedipine produced concentration-dependent relaxations in tissues contracted at various high [K(+)](e). In tissues contracted with 20 mm [K(+)](e), the pIC(50) for nifedipine was significantly (8.20 +/- 0.05; n = 6; mean +/- SEM; P < 0.05) greater than in tissues contracted with > or =40 mm [K(+)](e). 3.-- Tissues contracted with 20 mm [K(+)](e) also relaxed in response to mibefradil (pIC(50) = 6.1 +/- 0.14) and pinacidil (pIC(50) = 6.45 +/- 0.08), the latter being almost completely reversed (93.4 +/- 9.9%) by addition of glibenclamide (10 microm). 4.-- The resting E(m) of smooth muscle cells of saphenous vein was -77.0 +/- 0.7 mV (n = 52), and 20 mm [K(+)](e) produced a modest but significant depolarization to -73.0 +/- 0.7 mV (n = 52). Incubation with pinacidil plus 20 mm [K(+)](e) resulted in a significant hyperpolarization of the E(m) to -82 +/- 0.6 mV (n = 52). 5.-- N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester did not impede the relaxant responses of nifedipine, mibefradil or pinacidil. 6.-- In conclusion, the relaxant effects of nifedipine and pinacidil (i) occurred at an E(m) distinctly below the presumed threshold for the opening of the classic (Ca(V)1.3alpha(1)) L-type Ca(2+) channels, and (ii) did not depend on generation of nitric oxide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".