Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 31 year old woman presented with generalised weakness and muscle pain a week after having a flu-like illness, which had resolved completely. She had no diarrhoea, vomiting, urinary symptoms, joint pains, rashes, dry eyes, or dry mouth. Her medical history was unremarkable. Physical examination showed that she was well hydrated. Blood pressure was 102/55 mm Hg, pulse rate 88 beats/min. Muscle strength was 4/5 and 0/5 in the flexor muscle groups and 1/5 and 4/5 in the extensor muscle groups of the upper limbs and lower limbs, respectively. Deep tendon reflexes were brisk in the upper and lower limbs. No sensory deficit was found and the Babinski reflex test was negative. The rest of the physical examination was unremarkable. Initial blood results were sodium 141 mmol/L (normal range 135-145), potassium 1.7 mmol/L (3.5-5.0), chloride 118 mmol/L (98-110), carbon dioxide 14 mmol/L (21-30), anion gap 11 mmol/L (10-20), urea 5.4 mmol/L (3.0-7.1), creatinine 69 µmol/L (60-130), creatine kinase 320 U/L (30-135). Urine results were pH 7.00 (5.0-8.0), sodium 47 mmol/L, potassium 13.2 mmol/L, chloride 52 mmol/L, calcium 1.50 mmol/L, and creatinine 3.9 mmol/L. Arterial blood gases on room air showed pH 7.31 (7.35-7.45), partial pressure of carbon dioxide 26 mm Hg (33-45), partial pressure of oxygen 111 mm Hg (75-100), bicarbonate 15 mmol/L (22-26), and base excess −12.1 mmol/L (−2.5 to 2.5). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 106 mm in the first hour (0-20). Complete blood count, thyroid function tests, and liver panel were normal. She had a polyclonal increase in gammaglobulins 24.5g (6.0-18.0), IgG of 27.90 g …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".