Wavelength-dependent waveform characteristics of tectal evoked potentials in rainbow trout
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wavelength-dependent properties of tectal evoked potentials (TEPs) in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792), were examined. It was found that TEP waveforms show distinct variation as a function of wavelength. In addition, the data suggest that the On and Off channels of the tectum each possess different wavelength-dependent characteristics. Middle wavelength stimulation typically evoked a waveform similar to that reported for another anamniote vertebrate, the toad (genus Bufo Laurenti, 1768). For the On and Off responses, this waveform comprised two negative deflections, N1 and N2, which were interrupted by a positive deflection, P2. The N2 deflection was followed by a final positive deflection, P3. Principal component analysis revealed that the N2–P3 complex of the On response was significantly more pronounced at longer wavelengths. In contrast, the N2–P3 complex was most pronounced at middle wavelengths for the Off response. The N1 deflection was relatively invariant with respect to wavelength. Should colour-opponent tectal units provide a significant contribution to the TEP, it is probable that its waveform characteristics provide signs of underlying neural processes which facilitate colour discrimination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".