MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2059515425 · doi:10.1086/386302

GSH 23.0−0.7+117: A Neutral Hydrogen Shell in the Inner Galaxy

2004· article· en· W2059515425 on OpenAlexaff
J. M. Stil, A. R. Taylor, P. G. Martin, T. A. Rothwell, J. M. Dickey, N. M. McClure‐Griffiths

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyShell (structure)RADIUSGalactic plane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GSH 23.0-0.7+117 is a well-defined neutral hydrogen shell discovered in the Very Large Array (VLA) Galactic Plane Survey (VGPS). Only the blueshifted side of the shell was detected. The expansion velocity and systemic velocity were determined through the systematic behavior of the H I emission with velocity. The center of the shell is at ( l , b , v ) = (23 05, - 0 77, + 117 km s -1 ). The angular radius of the shell is 6 8, or 15 pc at a distance of 7.8 kpc. The H I mass divided by the volume of the half-shell implies an average density n H = 11 ± 4 cm -3 for the medium in which the shell expanded. The estimated age of GSH 23.0-0.7+117 is 1 Myr, with an upper limit of 2 Myr. The modest expansion energy of 2 × 10 48 ergs could have been provided by the stellar wind of a single O4-O8 star over the age of the shell. The 3 σ upper limit to the 1.4 GHz continuum flux density ( S 1.4 < 248 mJy) is used to derive an upper limit to the Lyman continuum luminosity generated inside the shell. This upper limit implies a maximum of one O9 star (i.e., O8-O9.5, taking into account the error in the distance) inside the H I shell, unless most of the incident ionizing flux leaks through the H I shell. To allow this, the shell should be fragmented on scales smaller than the beam (2.3 pc). If the stellar wind bubble is not adiabatic or the bubble has burst (as suggested by the H I channel maps), agreement between the energy and ionization requirements is even less likely. The limit set by the nondetection in the continuum provides a significant challenge for the interpretation of GSH 23.0-0.7+117 as a stellar wind bubble. A similar analysis may be applicable to other Galactic H I shells that have not been detected in the continuum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→