Assembly of Retinal Rod or Cone Na<sup>+</sup>/Ca<sup>2+</sup>-K<sup>+</sup> Exchanger Oligomers with cGMP-Gated Channel Subunits as Probed with Heterologously Expressed cDNAs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proper control of intracellular free Ca(2+) is thought to involve subsets of proteins that co-localize to mediate coordinated Ca(2+) entry and Ca(2+) extrusion. The outer segments of vertebrate rod and cone photoreceptors present one example: Ca(2+) influx is exclusively mediated via cGMP-gated channels (CNG), whereas the Na(+)/Ca(2+)-K(+) exchanger (NCKX) is the only Ca(2+) extrusion protein present. In situ, a rod NCKX homodimer and a CNG heterotetramer are thought to be part of a single protein complex. However, NCKX-NCKX and NCKX-CNG interactions have been described so far only in bovine rod outer segment membranes. We have used thiol-specific cross-linking and co-immunoprecipitation to examine NCKX self-assembly and CNG-NCKX co-assembly after heterologous expression of either the rod or cone NCKX/CNG isoforms. Co-immunoprecipitation clearly demonstrated both NCKX homooligomerization and interactions between NCKX and CNG. The NCKX-NCKX and NCKX-CNG interactions were observed for both the rod and the cone isoforms. Thiol-specific cross-linking led to rod NCKX1 dimers and to cone NCKX2 adducts of an apparent molecular weight higher than that predicted for a NCKX2 dimer. The mass of the cross-link product critically depended on the location of the particular cysteine residue used by the cross-linker, and we cannot exclude that NCKX forms a higher oligomer. The NCKX-NCKX and NCKX-CNG interactions were not isoform-specific (i.e., rod NCKX could interact with cone NCKX, rod NCKX could interact with cone CNGA, and vice versa). Deletion of the two large hydrophilic loops from the NCKX protein did not abolish the NCKX oligomerization, suggesting that it is mediated by the highly conserved transmembrane spanning segments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".