MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059551375 · doi:10.1063/1.3694124

Characterizing counter-streaming interpenetrating plasmas relevant to astrophysical collisionless shocks

2012· article· en· W2059551375 on OpenAlexaff
J. S. Ross, S. H. Glenzer, Peter Amendt, R. L. Berger, L. Divol, N. L. Kugland, O. L. Landen, C. Plechaty, B. A. Remington, D. D. Ryutov, W. Rozmus, D. H. Froula, G. Fiksel, C. Sorce, Yasuhiro Kuramitsu, T. Morita, Y. Sakawa, H. Takabe, R. P. Drake, Michael Grosskopf, Carolyn Kuranz, G. Gregori, J. Meinecke, C. D. Murphy, A. Pełka, A. Ravasio, T. Vinci, Edison Liang, R. Presura, Anatoly Spitkovsky, Francesco Miniati, H.‐S. Park

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPlasmaFOIL methodAtomic physicsThomson scatteringIonShock (circulatory)Electron temperatureCoulomb explosionMean free pathElectronOmegaScatteringIonizationOpticsNuclear physicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of Omega experiments have produced and characterized high velocity counter-streaming plasma flows relevant for the creation of collisionless shocks. Single and double CH2 foils have been irradiated with a laser intensity of ∼ 1016 W/cm2. The laser ablated plasma was characterized 4 mm from the foil surface using Thomson scattering. A peak plasma flow velocity of 2000 km/s, an electron temperature of ∼ 110 eV, an ion temperature of ∼ 30 eV, and a density of ∼ 1018 cm−3 were measured in the single foil configuration. Significant increases in electron and ion temperatures were seen in the double foil geometry. The measured single foil plasma conditions were used to calculate the ion skin depth, c/ωpi∼0.16 mm, the interaction length, ℓint, of ∼ 8 mm, and the Coulomb mean free path, λmfp∼27mm. With c/ωpi≪ℓint≪λmfp, we are in a regime where collisionless shock formation is possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations115
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of PlasmasSame topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207