Relative and Regional Stabilities of the Hamster, Mouse, Rabbit, and Bovine Prion Proteins toward Urea Unfolding Assessed by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Circular Dichroism Spectroscopies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The residue-specific urea-induced unfolding patterns of recombinant prion proteins from different species (bovine, rabbit, mouse, and Syrian hamster) were monitored using high-resolution (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Protein constructs of different lengths, and with and without a His tag attached at the N-terminus, were studied. The various species showed different overall sensitivities toward urea denaturation with stabilities in the following order: hamster ≤ mouse < rabbit < bovine protein. This order is in agreement with recent circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopic measurements for several species [Khan, M. Q. (2010) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.107, 19808-19813] and for the bovine protein presented herein. The [urea](1/2) values determined by CD spectroscopy parallel those of the most stable residues observed by NMR spectroscopy. Neither the longer constructs containing an additional hydrophobic region nor the His tag influenced the stability of the structured domain of the constructs studied. The effect of the S174N mutation in rabbit PrP(C) was also investigated. The rank order of the regional stabilities within each protein remained the same for all species. In particular, the residues in the β-sheet region in all four species were more sensitive to urea-induced unfolding than residues in the α2 and α3 helical regions. These observations indicate that the regional specific unfolding pattern is the same for the four mammalian prion proteins studied but militate against the idea that PrP(Sc) formation is linked with the global stability of PrP(C).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".