MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059637489 · doi:10.1021/op0002904

Development and Scale Up of a Route to Cyclohexylhydrazine Dimethanesulfonate

2000· article· en· W2059637489 on OpenAlexaff
Terrence J. Connolly, Andrew J. Crittall, Alkarim S. Ebrahim, Guijun Ji

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic Process Research & Development · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsAlberta Energy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethanesulfonic acidChemistryDecarboxylationCyclohexanoneCarboxylateHydrazine (antidepressant)Organic chemistryHydrolysisBoraneHydrazoneDerivatizationMedicinal chemistryCatalysisChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mild, high-yielding synthesis of cyclohexylhydrazine dimethanesulfonate has been developed that is suitable for further scale up. The process consists of three chemical steps: condensation of cyclohexanone with tert -butyl carbazate, reduction of the hydrazone carboxylate to a hydrazine carboxylate with borane−THF, and hydrolysis, decarboxylation, and derivatization with methanesulfonic acid. From studies using a reaction calorimeter, it was determined that the last stage of the process occurs in two discrete steps, requiring 2 equiv of methanesulfonic acid. The first equivalent of acid is consumed by N-protonation. Deprotection of the Boc group occurs with the second equivalent of acid, as evident by the gas evolution. The heat of reaction for the acid addition was determined to be 57.7 kJ/kg and represents an adiabatic temperature rise of 27.4 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganic Process Research & DevelopmentSame topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207