CDP571, a humanised monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis factor α, for moderate to severe Crohn’s disease: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Targeting tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) has demonstrated efficacy in Crohn's disease. AIM: To evaluate CDP571, a humanised antibody to TNF-alpha, for treating active Crohn's disease. PATIENTS: A total of 396 patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease. METHODS: In a 28 week, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial, patients received intravenous CDP571 (10 mg/kg) or placebo every eight weeks to week 24. The primary outcome measure was clinical response (a decrease in the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) to > or =100 points or remission (CDAI score < or =150 points)) at week 28. A secondary outcome measure was clinical response (using the same definition) at week 2. RESULTS: Clinical response occurred at week 28 in 80/263 (30.4%) CDP571 patients and 31/132 (23.5%) placebo patients (p = 0.102). Clinical response at week 2 occurred in 90/263 (34.2%) CDP571 patients and 28/132 (21.2%) placebo patients (p = 0.011). Post hoc exploratory subgroup analysis of 159 patients with baseline C reactive protein (CRP) > or =10 mg/l demonstrated significant differences between CDP571 and placebo in clinical response rates at weeks 2 (CDP571, 50/101 (49.5%); placebo, 9/58 (15.5%); p<0.001) and 28 (CDP571, 29/101 (28.7%); placebo, 7/58 (12.1%); p = 0.018). Adverse events occurred at similar frequencies in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: CDP571 is modestly effective for short but not long term treatment of unselected patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease. The clinical relevance of this short term effect is unclear. Post hoc analysis suggests both short and long term efficacy of CDP571 in patients with elevated baseline CRP (> or =10 mg/l). CDP571 is well tolerated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".