MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059782236 · doi:10.1121/1.4783337

Gesture controlled synthetic speech and song.

2009· article· en· W2059782236 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sidney Fels, Bob Pritchard, Eric Vatikiotis‐Bateson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman Motion and Animation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestureComputer scienceSpeech recognitionSpeech synthesisIntelligibility (philosophy)Vocal tractRendering (computer graphics)Natural (archaeology)Human–computer interactionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe progress on creating digital ventriloquized actors (DIVAs). DIVAs use hand gestures to synthesize audiovisual speech and song by means of an intermediate conversion of hand gestures to articulator (e.g., tongue, jaw, lip, and vocal chords) parameters of a computational three-dimensional vocal tract model. Our parallel-formant speech synthesizer is modified to fit within the MAX/MSP visual programming language. We added spatial sound and various voice excitation parameters in an easy-to-use environment suitable for musicians. The musician’s gesture style is learned from examples. DIVAs will be used in three composed stage works of increasing complexity performed internationally, starting with one performer initially and culminating in three performers simultaneously using their natural voices as well as the hand-based synthesizer. Training performances will be used to study the processes associated with skill acquisition, the coordination of multiple “voices” within and among performers, and the intelligibility and realism of this new form of audio/visual speech production. We are also building a robotic face and computer graphics face that will be gesture controlled and synchronized with the speech and song. [This project is funded by the Canada Council for the Arts and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada. More information is at: www.magic.ubc.ca/VisualVoice.htm]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicHuman Motion and AnimationFrench-language works237,207