Improving Search and Rescue Using Contextual Information
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Search and rescue (SAR) is a challenging application for autonomous robotics research. The requirements of this kind of application are very demanding and are still far from being met. One of the most compelling requirements is the capability of robots to adapt their functionalities to harsh and heterogeneous environments. In order to meet this requirement, it is common to embed contextual knowledge into robotic modules. We have previously developed a context-based architecture that decouples contextual knowledge, and its use, from typical robotic functionalities. In this paper, we show how it is possible to use this approach to enhance the performance of a robotic system involved in SAR missions. In particular, we provide a case study on exploration and victim detection tasks, specifically tailored to a given SAR mission. Moreover, we extend our contextual knowledge formalism in order to manage complex rules that deal with spatial and temporal aspects that are needed to model mission requirements. The approach has been validated through several experiments that show the effectiveness of the presented methodology for SAR. (C) Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden and The Robotics Society of Japan, 2009
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it