MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2059874335 · doi:10.3109/13813451003610862

Effects of TGF-β1 on endothelial factors

2010· article· en· W2059874335 on OpenAlexafffund
Éric Cellier, Adil El Midaoui, Geneviève Robitaille, Darren E. Richard, Richard Larivière, Marcel Lebel

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Physiology and Biochemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTGF-β signaling in diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHôtel-Dieu de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsProstacyclinTransforming growth factorInternal medicineEndocrinologyNitric oxideEndothelial stem cellSecretionInhibitory postsynaptic potentialChemistryEndothelin 1EndotheliumBiologyBiochemistryIn vitroMedicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigated the mechanistic effect of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGFbeta1) on the endothelial mediators: endothelin-1 (ET-1), prostacyclin (PGI(2)) and nitric oxide (NO) in the endothelial cell line 1G11. Endothelial cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of TGFbeta1 in the presence and absence of growth medium (deprived) or various inhibitors. In deprived cells, TGFbeta1 increased the release of PGI(2) (6-keto-PGF1alpha) concomitantly to an increase in COX-2 expression, whereas the production of ET-1 and NO metabolites was not affected. Either the removal of prior serum and heparin deprivation or NO synthase inhibition by L-NAME unmasked an inhibitory effect of TGFbeta1 on ET-1 production. Indomethacin abolished the TGFbeta1 inhibitory action on L-NAME-increased ET-1 production. These results show that TGFbeta1 induces an increase in production of PGI(2) that is consecutive to an induction of COX-2 in endothelial cells. This increase in PGI(2) partly accounts for the inhibitory action of TGFbeta1 on ET-1 secretion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Physiology and BiochemistrySame topicTGF-β signaling in diseasesFrench-language works237,207